A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Luz Aliany Lozano Cardenas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Se confirma en su integridad el auto recurrido
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica interpuesto en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.
La Sala Plena estima que no se presentó la corrección de la demanda en los términos fijados en el auto de inadmisión y, en consecuencia, decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del veintiseis (26) de enero de dos mil dieciseis (2016) proferido por el Despacho del Magistrado Sustanciador Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, mediante el cual rechazo la demanda formulada por los ciudadanos Luz Eliany Lozano Cardenas, Jorge Enrique Segura Fula, Walter Orlando Rendon Hermosa y Nelson Armando Nino Peralta contra el Articulo 7 (parcial) del Decreto Ley 4057 de 2011.
- SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a los demandantes, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.